Currently in the Playground

One–Time WearView full piece

 

Stereograms

Art • August 27th, 2006

The first time I saw one of these things, I was in college. People were crowded around a couple of framed images for sale, and you could hear silence followed by sudden expressions of excitement as soon as someone was able to “get in” and see the hidden 3D image. You could also hear the frustration of those who couldn’t see beyond the psychedelic shapes.

3D image

As soon as I was able to “get in” for the first time, I became a natural, always able to take any of these and see through it to find the prize. Many people relied on tricks like focusing on their own reflection on the glass, or starting with the image really close to the eyes and pulling away slowly. But I was proud to be able to just stare through and get there pretty quickly. So I bought one for myself before the rave would pass.

I must confess that over time, trying to see the image again became a bit more difficult, and finally, yesterday I had to use one of the common tricks to get back in. I was curious to see if a digital image of it would preserve the effect. I guess this shows my ignorance on the subject. In fact: Yes, a digital copy of the original still shows the 3D image. If you want to try, you can see a larger version of the above piece here (Much easier to see than the small one).

Trying to investigate a little more about the subject I found several resources on the Internet. For instance, I found that in general they are called , and the piece shown on this page is an since only one image is used. Many other resources discuss stereo pairs which in order to see, you must cross your eyes, and sorry: That hurts too much!

At some point during my struggle trying to see the 3D image, I focused the wrong way and ended up seeing the image reversed. That is, I saw the background jumping in front of the foreground. I didn’t know that was possible. Today I’m having no problem at all. I guess it’s simply a matter of practice.

6 comments:

  1. On August 27th, 2006 at 2:31 pm, Petie wrote:

    In general, these have always been strange to me. I do see the images, but once you’ve seen the image, would you really want it hanging on your wall? What are the two things on the side of the scorpion? Plants?

  2. On August 27th, 2006 at 4:33 pm, Maria wrote:

    I agree. This is not the kind of thing I want decorating my walls. I keep it with my watercolors, so every time I look at those, I give the stereogram a try.

    Around the scorpion I see two things that look like desert plants to me, and behind: a mountain or hill. You saw who the scorpion is fighting, right?

  3. On August 28th, 2006 at 8:31 am, Danny wrote:

    I cross my eyes all the time (thanks, lazy eye!) and I still have never ever seen one of these in spite of trying all the “tricks” I’ve ever heard. I’m actually even pretty good at crossing/uncrossing my eyes and focusing/unfocusing them and yet none of the combinations I’ve ever tried have ever worked :(

  4. On August 28th, 2006 at 7:35 pm, Petie wrote:

    it’s a spider he is fighting, right? The scorpion was most clear to me. It’s ok Danny, Chris just told me he can’t see them either.

  5. On August 28th, 2006 at 8:00 pm, Maria wrote:

    Yes. It’s a fight between a scorpion and a tarantula.
    Sorry you can’t see them boys! :(

    Danny -
    I never noticed a lazy eye on you. If it’s true, that could explain why you can’t see stereograms. I read it on this page yesterday.

  6. On August 30th, 2006 at 12:17 pm, Jennifer wrote:

    I too have never ever ever been able to see these. I remember one day, when there were STORES at the mall that sold these [I’m sorry] UGLY “artworks”, the sales-lady was trying to hard to convince me that EVERYone can see them.

    I told her that after numrerous attempts, using ALL the methods they swore by (eye-crossing, reflections, background staring, focus/unfocus - you name it) I was NOT ABLE TO SEE THEM. Yet she kept pushing and pushing me. Now, I know it was her job to sell them, but instead she made me feel inferior and somehow stupid.

    In the end I wonder - WHY? Who gives a hoot? There’s not much to the image in the first place - just a mishmash of poorly coordinated colors and shapes that you have to stare at to see the hidden message. Why not just show the dang message? If they in themselves were a beautiful work of art, then I’d say, OK, there’s a bonus if I can see the other hidden items.

Write a comment:

Note: Comments in this site are moderated. Please do not submit your comment more than once – you will see it appear shortly.

Name and email are required.


Recent Entries

Archives

. . . . .

Web site design by

MQStudio (TM)

Beautiful, clean, and professional web design and development.

Visit our portfolio »